| Welcome to Wars Wiki! |
|---|
| Welcome to Wars Wiki. Please log in or create an account to make changes. |
Talk:Damage: Difference between revisions
From Wars Wiki
Latest comment: 18 June 2010 by FireFly in topic Formula images
m (→Formula images: new section) |
m (Darn it, forgot to sign) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
: [[Image:Damage eq2.png]] | : [[Image:Damage eq2.png]] | ||
<small>''—Preceding unsigned comment by [[User:FireFly]] at approx. 18:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC).''</small> | |||
Revision as of 18:58, 18 June 2010
Possible error, or different formula?
Is it really the same formula being used in all games? If that is not the case, either Image:Aw1_damage_chart.jpg or Image:AWDS damage chart.jpg has wrong data. Maybe I'll check later by calculating the formula with default values, but I'm writing this down here so I don't forget about it. ~FireFly tc 15:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Or the units simply have a different amount of defensive/offensive stars. Ignore the question above, please. :) ~FireFly tc 22:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Strange mark in chart?
Image:AWDS_damage_chart.jpg has some kind of mark for Md Tank attacking Missiles, which, by the way, the ones from older/later games don't have. Does anyone know what it means? I made it bold in the wikitable version I'm editing atm.
- I'm not sure, but it looks like it's just the cell that was highlighted when the image was created. — KC 15:13, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I didn't even think of the fact that it was probably an Excel sheet… Yes, you're probably right. ~FireFly tc 15:16, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Formula images
I propose we rewrite the formulas presented in this article a bit, and use these images instead:
—Preceding unsigned comment by User:FireFly at approx. 18:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC).
