Welcome to Wars Wiki!
Welcome to Wars Wiki. Please log in or create an account to make changes.

User talk:JFX: Difference between revisions

From Wars Wiki
Latest comment: 10 June 2023 by JFX in topic Tabs
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Tabs: new section)
Tags: New topic Mobile edit Mobile web edit
 
(→‎Tabs: Reply)
Line 2: Line 2:


I feel the two layer tabs overload the infobox and make it harder to access the images. Having artwork there gives a nice overview, but comparisons are better served in a gallery. [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|talk]]) 15:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
I feel the two layer tabs overload the infobox and make it harder to access the images. Having artwork there gives a nice overview, but comparisons are better served in a gallery. [[User:Prod|Prod]] ([[User talk:Prod|talk]]) 15:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
:Hello. I see, though I based the two-level tabs layout on that implemented on the Zelda Wiki ([[zeldawiki:Link|example]]). I guess a better implementation can be done if this site has the Scribunto installed and we were to revamp the infoboxes.
:For now on the CO pages, I think we can keep the artworks in the infobox and move the sprites to the gallery section.
:But for the unit pages, if two-level tabs are discouraged and we should have only one-level tabs on the infobox, should we...
:* Include only the model and classic sprite of the Orange Star version of the unit in the infobox, have everything else in the gallery?
:* Or, include only the models from AWRBC in the infobox, move the classic sprites to gallery?
:* Or, include only the classic sprites from the older games in the infobox, move the RBC models to gallery?
:There's also the case of the Days of Ruin sprites to handle, if we want to have those uploaded.
:Thanks, [[User:JFX|JFX]] ([[User talk:JFX|talk]]) 16:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:25, 10 June 2023

Tabs

I feel the two layer tabs overload the infobox and make it harder to access the images. Having artwork there gives a nice overview, but comparisons are better served in a gallery. Prod (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. I see, though I based the two-level tabs layout on that implemented on the Zelda Wiki (example). I guess a better implementation can be done if this site has the Scribunto installed and we were to revamp the infoboxes.
For now on the CO pages, I think we can keep the artworks in the infobox and move the sprites to the gallery section.
But for the unit pages, if two-level tabs are discouraged and we should have only one-level tabs on the infobox, should we...
  • Include only the model and classic sprite of the Orange Star version of the unit in the infobox, have everything else in the gallery?
  • Or, include only the models from AWRBC in the infobox, move the classic sprites to gallery?
  • Or, include only the classic sprites from the older games in the infobox, move the RBC models to gallery?
There's also the case of the Days of Ruin sprites to handle, if we want to have those uploaded.
Thanks, JFX (talk) 16:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]