| Welcome to Wars Wiki! |
|---|
| Welcome to Wars Wiki. Please log in or create an account to make changes. |
User talk:KC-Earthshaker/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
From Wars Wiki
Latest comment: 17 June 2010 by KC-Earthshaker in topic Nice
mNo edit summary |
m (→Nice) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::::I think you should add something in the lines of "<nowiki>| || colspan="6" style="background: #EFEFEF" | Land</nowiki>" for each "group" of unit (e.g. Land, Water, Air). The problem with that is that it breaks sorting, but maybe we don't even need sortable on the unit tables? By the way, I'll try and get sprites for those other units now, looks strange when half of the files are missing. ~[[User:FireFly|FireFly]] <sup>[[User talk:FireFly|t]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4px">[[Special:Contributions/FireFly|c]]</sub> 16:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | ::::I think you should add something in the lines of "<nowiki>| || colspan="6" style="background: #EFEFEF" | Land</nowiki>" for each "group" of unit (e.g. Land, Water, Air). The problem with that is that it breaks sorting, but maybe we don't even need sortable on the unit tables? By the way, I'll try and get sprites for those other units now, looks strange when half of the files are missing. ~[[User:FireFly|FireFly]] <sup>[[User talk:FireFly|t]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4px">[[Special:Contributions/FireFly|c]]</sub> 16:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::Also, I think we should keep the system with header/entry/footer templates, since you may want to create a list of units for some other page, and not always the whole set of units for a given game, but the idea with game separate units would be good too (if that was what you meant by <nowiki>{{AW units}}</nowiki>. Also, forgive me for forgetting that the wiki is not only about Advance Wars; they're the only games of the Wars series I've played. Perhaps the way these lists are structured don't fit at all with [[Battalion Wars]]? ~[[User:FireFly|FireFly]] <sup>[[User talk:FireFly|t]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4px">[[Special:Contributions/FireFly|c]]</sub> 16:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | ::::Also, I think we should keep the system with header/entry/footer templates, since you may want to create a list of units for some other page, and not always the whole set of units for a given game, but the idea with game separate units would be good too (if that was what you meant by <nowiki>{{AW units}}</nowiki>. Also, forgive me for forgetting that the wiki is not only about Advance Wars; they're the only games of the Wars series I've played. Perhaps the way these lists are structured don't fit at all with [[Battalion Wars]]? ~[[User:FireFly|FireFly]] <sup>[[User talk:FireFly|t]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4px">[[Special:Contributions/FireFly|c]]</sub> 16:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::Good point. Actually, by <nowiki>{{AW units}}</nowiki>, I just meant the whole thing, but it would be easier to break it down if you're only concerned with smaller groups of units. That's okay, I'm sort of the opposite of you; I've played both Battalion Wars games recently, and it's been longer since I fired up my Advance Wars - I guess that means we'll be able to complement each other's work. With you working on the Advance Wars games, and me working on Battalion Wars, we should be able to cover all the info we need. — [[User:KC-Earthshaker|<sup style="color:#7038F8"><b>K</b></sup>]][[User Talk:KC-Earthshaker|<span style="color:#7038F8"><b><small>C</small></b></span>]] 17:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:29, 17 June 2010
Nice
That table looks great for units! :D ~FireFly tc 15:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! I wasn't sure how to re-work that redlink for the Oozium's unit type, so that table is my backup plan. =] — KC 15:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think that table works better than the one I created anyway, and we could always have the user do the unit type link manually, like type=[[Infantry]]? I definitely think we should use this one instead of mine; that grey background and border is great! ~FireFly tc 15:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Always happy to help. =) I still have some ideas I want to try out with it, but hopefully I can change it over to a template soon. That way, all we'll have to type for all that is {{AW units}} or something. — KC 15:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think you should add something in the lines of "| || colspan="6" style="background: #EFEFEF" | Land" for each "group" of unit (e.g. Land, Water, Air). The problem with that is that it breaks sorting, but maybe we don't even need sortable on the unit tables? By the way, I'll try and get sprites for those other units now, looks strange when half of the files are missing. ~FireFly tc 16:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Also, I think we should keep the system with header/entry/footer templates, since you may want to create a list of units for some other page, and not always the whole set of units for a given game, but the idea with game separate units would be good too (if that was what you meant by {{AW units}}. Also, forgive me for forgetting that the wiki is not only about Advance Wars; they're the only games of the Wars series I've played. Perhaps the way these lists are structured don't fit at all with Battalion Wars? ~FireFly tc 16:42, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Good point. Actually, by {{AW units}}, I just meant the whole thing, but it would be easier to break it down if you're only concerned with smaller groups of units. That's okay, I'm sort of the opposite of you; I've played both Battalion Wars games recently, and it's been longer since I fired up my Advance Wars - I guess that means we'll be able to complement each other's work. With you working on the Advance Wars games, and me working on Battalion Wars, we should be able to cover all the info we need. — KC 17:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
