| Welcome to Wars Wiki! |
|---|
| Welcome to Wars Wiki. Please log in or create an account to make changes. |
User talk:KC-Earthshaker/Sandbox: Difference between revisions
From Wars Wiki
Latest comment: 17 June 2010 by FireFly in topic Nice
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::Always happy to help. =) I still have some ideas I want to try out with it, but hopefully I can change it over to a template soon. That way, all we'll have to type for all that is <nowiki>{{AW units}}</nowiki> or something. — [[User:KC-Earthshaker|<sup style="color:#7038F8"><b>K</b></sup>]][[User Talk:KC-Earthshaker|<span style="color:#7038F8"><b><small>C</small></b></span>]] 15:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | :::Always happy to help. =) I still have some ideas I want to try out with it, but hopefully I can change it over to a template soon. That way, all we'll have to type for all that is <nowiki>{{AW units}}</nowiki> or something. — [[User:KC-Earthshaker|<sup style="color:#7038F8"><b>K</b></sup>]][[User Talk:KC-Earthshaker|<span style="color:#7038F8"><b><small>C</small></b></span>]] 15:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::I think you should add something in the lines of: | |||
<pre> | |||
| || colspan="6" style="background: #EFEFEF" | Land | |||
</pre> | |||
::::for each "group" of unit (e.g. Land, Water, Air). The problem with that is that it breaks sorting, but maybe we don't even need sortable on the unit tables? By the way, I'll try and get sprites for those other units now, looks strange when half of the files are missing. ~[[User:FireFly|FireFly]] <sup>[[User talk:FireFly|t]]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-4px">[[Special:Contributions/FireFly|c]]</sub> 16:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:37, 17 June 2010
Nice
That table looks great for units! :D ~FireFly tc 15:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! I wasn't sure how to re-work that redlink for the Oozium's unit type, so that table is my backup plan. =] — KC 15:24, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think that table works better than the one I created anyway, and we could always have the user do the unit type link manually, like type=[[Infantry]]? I definitely think we should use this one instead of mine; that grey background and border is great! ~FireFly tc 15:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Always happy to help. =) I still have some ideas I want to try out with it, but hopefully I can change it over to a template soon. That way, all we'll have to type for all that is {{AW units}} or something. — KC 15:59, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think you should add something in the lines of:
| || colspan="6" style="background: #EFEFEF" | Land
- for each "group" of unit (e.g. Land, Water, Air). The problem with that is that it breaks sorting, but maybe we don't even need sortable on the unit tables? By the way, I'll try and get sprites for those other units now, looks strange when half of the files are missing. ~FireFly tc 16:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
