User talk:JFX

Tabs

I feel the two layer tabs overload the infobox and make it harder to access the images. Having artwork there gives a nice overview, but comparisons are better served in a gallery. Prod (talk) 15:51, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I see, though I based the two-level tabs layout on that implemented on the Zelda Wiki (example). I guess a better implementation can be done if this site has the Scribunto installed and we were to revamp the infoboxes.

For now on the CO pages, I think we can keep the artworks in the infobox and move the sprites to the gallery section.

But for the unit pages, if two-level tabs are discouraged and we should have only one-level tabs on the infobox, should we...

• Include only the model and classic sprite of the Orange Star version of the unit in the infobox, have everything else in the gallery?
• Or, include only the models from AWRBC in the infobox, move the classic sprites to gallery?
• Or, include only the classic sprites from the older games in the infobox, move the RBC models to gallery?

There's also the case of the Days of Ruin sprites to handle, if we want to have those uploaded.

Thanks, JFX (talk) 16:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Specifically on Zelda I feel 2 layers of tabs is overcomplicated and not as clear for users.

Sounds good for the CO pages. I'm open to suggestions for unit pages. Maybe the most modern image cause they look nicer? Or any composite images that shows a few different ones together? Maybe we stay consistent with only artwork in the infobox? What do you feel is best? Prod (talk) 16:55, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

{{Unit Tabs}} looks good! Prod (talk) 21:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Please try to avoid the use of #ifexist. It's considered an expensive parser function, and if the page doesn't exist, it will show up on Special:Wantedfiles. Prod (talk) 23:26, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Extensions

I've enabled EmbedVideo. What are you looking to set up with Scribunto? Prod (talk) 01:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)