User:KC-Earthshaker/Sandbox

Icon Name Type Cost Movement Fuel Vision Infantry Infantry 1,000 3 (foot) 99 2 Mech Infantry 3,000 2 (foot) 70 2 Recon Vehicle 4,000 8 (tire) 80 5 Tank Vehicle 7,000 6 (tread) 70 3 Medium Tank Vehicle 16,000 5 (tread) 50 1 Neotank Vehicle 22,000 6 (tread) 99 1 Mega Tank Vehicle 28,000 4 (tread) 50 1 APC Vehicle 5,000 6 (tread) 70 1 Artillery Vehicle 6,000 5 (tread) 99 1 Rocket Vehicle 15,000 5 (tire) 50 1 Anti-Air Vehicle 8,000 6 (tread) 60 2 Piperunner Vehicle 20,000 9 (pipe) 99 4 Oozium --- --- 1 (Oozium) ∞ 1 Lander Ship 12,000 6 (transport) 99 1 Cruiser Ship 18,000 6 (ship) 99 3 Submarine Submarine 20,000 5 (ship) 60 5 Battleship Ship 28,000 5 (ship) 99 2 Carrier Ship 30,000 5 (ship) 99 4 Black Boat Ship 7,500 7 (transport) 60 1 B Copter Copter 9,000 6 (air) 99 3 T Copter Copter 5,000 6 (air) 99 2 Fighter Plane 28,000 9 (air) 99 2 Bomber Plane 22,000 7 (air) 99 2 Stealth Plane 24,000 6 (air) 60 4 Black Bomb Bomb 24,000 9 (air) 99 1

Bold indicates a unit that was introduced in this game.

Header:

Unit		Type	Cost	Mvmt	Fuel	Vision

Body:

[[Image:{{{imagename}}}]]

[[{{{unitname}}}]]

{{{terraintype}}}

{{{cost}}}

{{{movementrange}}}

{{{fuel}}}

{{{vision}}}

Footer:

Okay, this is what the unitlist combo does now:

Unit		Type	Cost	Move	Range	Fuel	Ammo	Vision
	{{{name}}}	{{{type}}}	1,000	{{{moverange}}}	{{{ATKrange}}}	99	{{{ammo}}}	3
	{{{name}}}	{{{type}}}	1,000	{{{moverange}}}	{{{ATKrange}}}	99	{{{ammo}}}	3
	{{{name}}}	{{{type}}}	1,000	{{{moverange}}}	{{{ATKrange}}}	99	{{{ammo}}}	3
A colored background indicates a unit that was introduced in this game.

...why on Earth is the Vision info floating? o_0 I have to run some errands, but I'll be back later tonight to tackle this. — ^KC 20:30, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Huh, strange. I'll see if I can figure it out... ~FireFly ^t_c 20:36, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Seems the source for the others are " foo ", but for some reason the vision entry is surrounded by newlines instead :\. ~FireFly ^t_c 20:39, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Ta-daa! :) ~FireFly ^t_c 21:05, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Haha, awesome! — ^KC 21:18, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I think we should rename the parameters a bit, I think "name" and "type" would work better, since, well, each entry is about a unit anyway, so "unit-" is kind of implied, and I think it's more of a unit type rather than a terrain type. Also, I'll go to bed soon. ~FireFly ^t_c 21:33, 17 June 2010 (UTC)